Angels, Demons, and Energy Non-Conservation
Posted by Seth Zenz on 13 May 2009 at 05:49 pm
Angels and Demons opened today here in Geneva, and I just got back from seeing it with a big group of my friends from CERN. (There was also a special early showing last week, which a few people I know went to, but I was neither lucky enough to get a ticket in the drawing nor important enough to get an automatic invitation.) We had a good time, especially with the opening. It had a lot of images from CERN — along with a lot that weren’t — and a lot of real particle physics terminology. Everything was rather scrambled. For example, a “luminosity of ten to the thirty-four” is a real measure of the intensity of the LHC’s collisions, but it’s a figure that will take years and significant upgrades (rather than minutes) to attain. Overall, the introduction gave us plenty of occasions for laughter, which the other movie-goers may have thought odd — unless they were from CERN too. Probably people who are knowledgeable about the Catholic church or renaissance art will find other parts of the movie equally mixed-up and entertaining.
I’m not spoiling much if I say that CERN’s critical role in the movie is producing a quarter of a gram of antimatter which is then used to threaten a large part of Rome with destruction. Antimatter really exists, that amount of it really could do what they said, and antimatter really is made and studied at particle physics laboratories like CERN. But it would take millions of years to produce that much at the present rate, and we don’t have the technology to store it even for even a fraction of a second in order to study it. I have a friend at Berkeley who works on an experiment at CERN to do exactly that, a few atoms at a time, but storing antimatter in visible quantities as an energy source is probably further from our current level of technology than mining hydrogen from the atmosphere of Jupiter and sending it back to earth.
The most frustrating part for physicists about the portrayal of antimatter is the way it seems to be magically produced for “free” energy. The universe never works that way: energy is conserved, which means that even with amazing technology you’d have to put in as much or more energy to make the antimatter as you’d get out later. There’s no such thing as a free lunch. The religious overtones put on the antimatter production, and on the woefully mis-nicknamed “God particle,” are also rather frustrating and inaccurate. Yes, we think that the Higgs boson or something like it is involved in producing some of the mass in the universe — but no, that doesn’t tell us anything about the book of Genesis or the meaning of life, the universe, and everything.
So let me be clear: we neither want nor expect to find the answers to any religious mysteries in our studies at the LHC. We also won’t make “red matter” like you saw in Star Trek — that’s entirely fictional. CERN doesn’t have a space plane or a secret vault with the seventh horocrux. The lab cafeteria does not serve soylent green, although it does have an excellent salad bar.
For more serious and detailed answers about the fact and fiction of Angels and Demons, CERN has a new website: angelsanddemons.cern.ch




I really do wish we could go back in time and convince Lederman to change the title of his book. This “God Particle” nonsense has turned into perpetual red herring in a field that is already hard enough to explain clearly. No matter how many times you explain to journalists it has nothing to do with anything and conveys no useful or interesting information, they keep stuffing it into articles. You’d think they were required by law to use the phrase “God Particle” at least once per story.
[...] 14 maj 2009 in böcker, vetenskap Läste just Angels, Demons, and Energy Non-Conservation från US LHC Blogs, där Seth Zenz avrundar sina intryck av filmen med en fin sammanfattning. So [...]
I just watched the movie and actually I liked it more than the book in a way. I liked the fact that they toned down the whole CERN vs. Catholics “war” in the movie and made the move an action/suspense instead of some crazy war.
The funny thing is aside from the beginning the whole CERN thing is majorly removed from the movie. The Cern director is totally out.
Well nice post and nice view of the movie.
http://ourearthlyrights.blogspot.com/
[...] заметил Сет Зенс (Seth Zenz), один из американских аспирантов, [...]
Guys – never mind Angels & Demons – what’s happening at CERN; no news for 2 weeks now!
Angels & Demons is a good thing because it has laypeople talking about things unimaginable, such as antimatter. The more this dialog continues, the more likely funding will flow. Also, there’s no telling where the next breakthrough will come from.
Although LHC is certainly massive, very important discoveries are being published elsewhere. PAMELA is just starting to report amazing extremely high-energy positrons potentially recorded as primary cosmic ray particles–a very unexpected finding.(Blasi Mar 16 Arxiv) The Integral-mission has just completed its initial mapping survey (http://www.esa.int/esaSC/SEMKTX2MDAF_index_0.html) AEGIS at CERN has a chance of proving fundamental dynamics of antimatter. And piggybacking on the work at AEGIS is the scappy new model being advanced by Hasanuddin that challenges old assumptions concerning antimatter (http://hypography.com/forums/alternative-theories/18910-the-dominium-model-by-hasanuddin.html)
Judging what is happening, I’m thinking that AEGIS, PAMELA, and/or Integral might easily beat LHC in producing poignant discovies.
I watched the movie and thought if your into action the movie is better, if your into conspiracies (mostly fictional) and intellectual information, the book wins by a landslide. Dan Brown exploits the hardships of both spectrums and I love his writing style although information is infact reconstructed.